1747-uic Driver Windows Xp Jun 2026
Once the hardware is recognized in the Windows Device Manager (check for the assigned COM number), you must configure the driver in RSLinx Classic. Driver Type DH485 UIC Devices (Recommended) or RS-232 DF1 Devices Comm Port Select the COM port number identified in Device Manager Device Type 1770-KF3/1747-KE (if using DF1 driver) Baud Rate Error Checking
Some driver packages include a Setup.exe . Right-click and select (even on XP with admin rights, this avoids permission issues).
For Windows XP, the most stable version is (released around 2008). Extract the zip file to a folder like C:\1747-UIC_Driver . 1747-uic driver windows xp
The is a USB to DH485 converter used to connect to SLC 500, MicroLogix, and other DH-485 PLCs. On Windows XP, it typically requires a CIP/USB driver (often from RSLinx Classic).
The is a bridge between the past and present of industrial automation. While Rockwell has moved on to newer devices like the 1747-UIC’s successor (the 1747-UIC is now discontinued), thousands of SLC 500 systems still run 24/7 on factory floors worldwide. By following this guide, you can ensure reliable programming and troubleshooting connectivity for years to come. Once the hardware is recognized in the Windows
Windows XP often requires a manual "Have Disk" installation to correctly recognize the hardware.
The is a USB-to-DH485 converter manufactured by Rockwell Automation. It allows a computer without a built-in serial port (or without a PCMK card) to connect to DH485 networks using a standard USB port. The device is essential for programming and monitoring: For Windows XP, the most stable version is
Q: What is the 1747-UIC driver used for? A: The 1747-UIC driver is used to enable communication between a computer and an Allen-Bradley SLC 500 series PLC.
If RSLinx shows a red X, the driver is not properly installed, or the COM port is in use by another application (like a modem or virtual COM redirector). Reboot and try again.
Despite Microsoft ending support for Windows XP years ago, many manufacturing plants still rely on XP-based engineering workstations. Reasons include: