Sharh Hanafiyah Page 89 Jun 2026

Take the examples from page 89 and draw Venn diagrams or use predicate logic symbols (∀, ∃, →). You will find that Mulla al-Hanafi’s analysis aligns remarkably well with modern predicate logic’s treatment of undistributed middles.

The commentary asserts the : Affirm the attributes mentioned in the Qur’an and Sunnah as real ( thubut ), but without asking how ( bila kayf ) and without likening them to creation ( tamthil ).

The author of the Sharh Hanafiyah explains that the "illah" is a critical component in the Hanafi school's approach to jurisprudence. According to this school, the "illah" must be based on a clear and rational principle, rather than mere speculation or personal opinion. This approach ensures that Islamic rulings are grounded in a systematic and coherent framework. Sharh Hanafiyah Page 89

On page 89, the reader learns a foundational rule of Sunni theology:

Page 89 typically refutes two extreme positions: Take the examples from page 89 and draw

Page 89 (referencing a standard printed edition, such as the Kazan or contemporary Beirut prints) falls squarely within the chapter on or, more specifically, the subsection on Shart al-‘Illah (Conditions of the Effective Cause).

“When the believer encounters an ayah describing Allah’s ‘istiwa’ (establishing) over the Throne, reason does not demand a physical sitting or resting, for Allah is free from need of the Throne. Rather, reason submits to the revealed wording, affirming a real meaning known only to Allah. To deny the wording is disbelief; to assign a physical modality is ignorance. The wise course is tafwid (consigning the ‘how’ to Allah) alongside affirmation of the attribute.” The author of the Sharh Hanafiyah explains that

By page 89, the author has already explained the basic figures ( ashkal ) of the syllogism. Now, he ventures into a treacherous region: The question posed is: When does a combination of premises necessarily yield a new, certain truth?

The significance of Sharh Hanafiyah Page 89 extends beyond the realm of Islamic jurisprudence. This discussion has contributed to the development of critical thinking and rational inquiry in Islamic scholarship, reflecting the Hanafi school's emphasis on reason and systematic analysis.

But what makes this particular page so significant? Whether you are a student of Ilm al-Kalam , a researcher of Hanafi methodology, or a curious reader exploring Islamic philosophy, understanding the contents of Page 89 is like finding a master key to a complex intellectual fortress.